<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosopher&#039;s Zone &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosopherzone.com/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com</link>
	<description>News and Views: Law, Philosophy and Psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Moral Dilemmas</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/moral-dilemmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/moral-dilemmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ethical dilemmas are often cited in an attempt to refute an ethical system or moral code, as well as the worldview that encompasses or grows from it. These arguments can be refuted in various ways, for example by showing that the claimed ethical dilemma is only apparent and does not really exist (thus is not <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/moral-dilemmas/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/moral-dilemmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Jurisprudence of a &#8216;Pig-Lit&#8217;: Babe and Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosophy-and-babe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosophy-and-babe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 01:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction Many people have fallen in love with Babe since its inception in 1995. It is an adaption from the kid-lit novel ‘The Sheep-Pig’, written by Dick King-Smith in 1983, which embarked upon changing the standpoint and belief, so firmly held by society, that pigs are stupid creatures, void of any other purpose other than <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosophy-and-babe/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosophy-and-babe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Art of Rhetoric: Logos, Pathos and Ethos</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-art-of-rhetoric-logos-pathos-and-ethos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-art-of-rhetoric-logos-pathos-and-ethos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ethos (Credibility) Or, ethical appeal, means convincing by the character of the author. We tend to believe people whom we respect. One of the central problems of argumentation is to project an impression to the reader that you are someone worth listening to, in other words making yourself as author into an authority on the <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-art-of-rhetoric-logos-pathos-and-ethos/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-art-of-rhetoric-logos-pathos-and-ethos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hegel &#8211; The Basic Guide for University</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-the-basic-guide-for-university/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-the-basic-guide-for-university/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dialectical Thinking Hegel&#8217;s different way of thinking has become known as dialectical thinking. What makes dialectical thinking so difficult to explain is that it can only be seen in practice. It is not a &#8220;method&#8221; or a set of principles, like Aristotle&#8217;s, which can be simply stated and then applied to whatever subject-matter one chooses. <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-the-basic-guide-for-university/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-the-basic-guide-for-university/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hegel Quotes (Quintessential List)</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-quotes-quintessential-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-quotes-quintessential-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spirit of a nation is reflected in its history, its religion, and the degree of its political freedom. The improvement of individual morality is a matter involving one’s private religion, one’s parents, one’s personal efforts, and one’s individual situation. The cultivation of the spirit of the people as a whole requires in addition the <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-quotes-quintessential-list/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/hegel-quotes-quintessential-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/an-introduction-to-the-principles-of-morals-and-legislation-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/an-introduction-to-the-principles-of-morals-and-legislation-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Written by Jeremy Bentham Chapter I OF THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY I. Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the standard of <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/an-introduction-to-the-principles-of-morals-and-legislation-2/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/an-introduction-to-the-principles-of-morals-and-legislation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offences Against One&#8217;s Self: Paederasty</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/offences-against-ones-self-paederasty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/offences-against-ones-self-paederasty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Written by Jeremy Bentham &#8211; Offences Against One&#8217;s Self: Paederasty (Sodomy) To what class of offences shall we refer these irregularities of the venereal appetite which are stiled unnatural? When hidden from the public eye there could be no colour for placing them any where else: could they find a place any where it would <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/offences-against-ones-self-paederasty/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/offences-against-ones-self-paederasty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion and the Vanity of Humans</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/opinion-and-the-vanity-of-humans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/opinion-and-the-vanity-of-humans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By a peculiar weakness of human nature, people generally think too much about the opinion that others form of them; although the slightest reflection will show that this opinion, whatever it may be, is not in itself essential to happiness. Therefore it is hard to understand why everybody feels so very pleased when he sees <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/opinion-and-the-vanity-of-humans/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/opinion-and-the-vanity-of-humans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Society Analogy: Humans and Porcupines</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-analogy-of-humans-and-porcupines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-analogy-of-humans-and-porcupines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of porcupines huddled together for warmth on a cold day in winter; but, as they began to prick one another with their quills, they were obliged to disperse. However the cold drove them together again, when just the same thing happened. At last, after many turns of huddling and dispersing, they discovered that <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-analogy-of-humans-and-porcupines/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-analogy-of-humans-and-porcupines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Women</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/on-women-arthur-schopenhauer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/on-women-arthur-schopenhauer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Written by Arthur Schopenhauer The nature of the female One needs only to see the way she is built to realize that woman is not intended for great mental or for great physical labor. She expiates the guilt of life not through activity but through suffering, through the pains of childbirth, caring for the child <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/on-women-arthur-schopenhauer/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/on-women-arthur-schopenhauer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TRUTH versus ASHHURST</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/law-as-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/law-as-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy Bentham ASHHURST.—I. No man is so low as not to be within the law’s protection. TRUTH.—Ninety-nine men out of a hundred are thus low. Every man is, who has not from five-and-twenty pounds, to five-and-twenty times five-and-twenty pounds, to sport with, in order to take his chance for justice. I say chance: remembering how <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/law-as-it-is/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/law-as-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critique of the Doctrine of Inalienable, Natural Rights.</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/critique-of-the-doctrine-of-inalienable-natural-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/critique-of-the-doctrine-of-inalienable-natural-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=1960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy Bentham, Anarchical Fallacies, vol. 2 of Bo wring, Works, 1843. The Declaration of Rights &#8212; I mean the paper published under that name by the French National Assembly in 1791 &#8212; assumes for its subject-matter a field of disquisition as unbounded in point of extent as it is important in its nature. But the <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/critique-of-the-doctrine-of-inalienable-natural-rights/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/critique-of-the-doctrine-of-inalienable-natural-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schopenhauer and Racism</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/schopenhauer-and-racism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/schopenhauer-and-racism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across Schopenhauer&#8217;s justification for racism. The highest civilization and culture, apart from the ancient Hindus and Egyptians, are found exclusively among the white races; and even with many dark peoples, the ruling caste or race is fairer in colour than the rest and has, therefore, evidently immigrated, for example, the Brahmins, the <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/schopenhauer-and-racism/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/schopenhauer-and-racism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robofetishism and Technosexuality</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robofetishism-and-technosexuality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robofetishism-and-technosexuality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technosexuality is fast becoming de rigour amongst the MTV generation, with their vibrating mobile WAP phones &#8220;going off&#8221; in their pockets, computer peripherals and multi-function entertainment systems. Found in all walks of life they can often be found hanging around electrical stores, exchanging glances over 32&#8243; LCD TV screens with integrated DVD players. Technosexuality may <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/robofetishism-and-technosexuality/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robofetishism-and-technosexuality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germaine Greer Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/germaine-greer-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/germaine-greer-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most powerful entities on earth are not governments but the multi-national corporations that see women as their territory, indoctrinating them with their versions of beauty, health and hygiene, medicating them and cultivating their dependency in order to medicate them some more. Women have somehow been separated from their libido, from their faculty of desire, <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/germaine-greer-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/germaine-greer-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real History of Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-real-history-of-capitalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-real-history-of-capitalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 04:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History Capitalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at the history of “trucking and bartering” itself; look at the history of modern capitalism, about which we know a lot. The first thing you’ll notice is, peasants had to be driven by force and violence into a wage-labor system they did not want; then major efforts were undertaken – conscious efforts <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-real-history-of-capitalism/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-real-history-of-capitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>English Proverbs</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/english-proverbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/english-proverbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proverbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Largest Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Largest List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Largest List Proverbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Proverbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unusual Proverbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have heard of any more English Proverbs please let me know by contacting me. A A bad settlement is better than a good lawsuit. A journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step. A bad penny always turns up. A bellyful is one of meat, drink, or sorrow. A big tree <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/english-proverbs/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/english-proverbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suicide Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/suicide-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/suicide-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I myself spent nine years in an insane asylum and I never had the obsession of suicide, but I know that each conversation with a psychiatrist, every morning at the time of his visit, made me want to hang myself, realizing that I would not be able to cut his throat. - Antonin Artaud “You <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/suicide-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/suicide-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Mortimer Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-mortimer-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-mortimer-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose that writers should, in a way, feel flattered by the censorship laws. They show a primitive fear and dread at the fearful magic of print. I found criminal clients easy and matrimonial clients hard. Matrimonial clients hate each other so much and use their children to hurt each other in beastly ways. Murderers <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-mortimer-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-mortimer-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Nozick Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nozick Juris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American libertarian philosopher (16/12/1938 – 23/1/2002). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) From each as they choose, to each as they are chosen. There is no social entity with a good that undergoes some sacrifice for its own good. There are only individual people, different individual people, with their own individual lives. Using one of these <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standpoint Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/standpoint-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/standpoint-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critique Standpoint Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standpoint Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standpoint Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Standpoint theory was created by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel to explore the social institution of slavery in 1807. It purports that individuals, who belong to certain groups, are naturally affected during their daily occurrences due to these acquaintances. Since people engage with individuals who are, to use a colloquial expression 'like-minded', they associate themselves with different social groups based on similarities to discover the inter-individual. Therefore, standpoint theory is a postmodern method for analysing inter-subjective discourses which extends some of the early insights about consciousness that emerged from Marxian critiques and identity politics.. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/standpoint-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brief Outline of Feminist Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 01:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judith Buttler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mckinnon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the early 1980s law became subject to a variety of new and influential critiques. The foremost being the culmination of feminism. The vindications of women’s rights lead to a prominent movements, whereby, contextualisation of domestic violence, rape, sexual objectification, oppression, sexual discrimination, marriage and sexual marginalisation became scrutinized against the social normality, and new <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roland Barthes Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/roland-barthes-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/roland-barthes-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The petit-bourgeois is a man unable to imagine the Other. If he comes face to face with him, he blinds himself, ignores and denies him, or else transforms him into himself. The discourse on the Text should itself be nothing other than text, research, textual activity, since the Text is that social space which leaves <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/roland-barthes-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/roland-barthes-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Virtue of Selfishness</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-virtue-of-selfishness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-virtue-of-selfishness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Ayn Rand Quotes) The men who attempt to survive, not by means of reason, but by means of force, are attempting to survive by the method of animals. Poverty, ignorance, illness and other problems of that kind are not metaphysical emergencies. By the metaphysical nature of man and of existence, man has to maintain his <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-virtue-of-selfishness/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-virtue-of-selfishness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/capitalism-the-unknown-ideal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/capitalism-the-unknown-ideal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unknown Ideal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Ayn Rand Quotes) Remember also that the smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights, cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/capitalism-the-unknown-ideal/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/capitalism-the-unknown-ideal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issues and Problems with Communism</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/issues-with-communism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/issues-with-communism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Communism does not destroy and cannot in principle destroy social differences among the people. It changes only their forms, leading social contrasts to the monstrous sizes, which are at least not inferior to those in the West. Communism does not eliminate the inequality between humanity, the social injustice, exploitation of humanity and other evils of <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/issues-with-communism/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/issues-with-communism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violence is not just Physical – Words that Underpin Intolerance</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/violence-is-not-just-physical-%e2%80%93-words-that-underpin-intolerance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/violence-is-not-just-physical-%e2%80%93-words-that-underpin-intolerance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Violence is not merely killing another. It is violence when we use a sharp word, when we make a gesture to brush away a person, when we obey because there is fear. So violence isn’t merely organized butchery in the name of God, in the name of society or country. Violence is much more subtle, <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/violence-is-not-just-physical-%e2%80%93-words-that-underpin-intolerance/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/violence-is-not-just-physical-%e2%80%93-words-that-underpin-intolerance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

