<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosopher&#039;s Zone &#187; Other Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosopherzone.com/category/other-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com</link>
	<description>News and Views: Law, Philosophy and Psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Philosopher Jokes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosopher-jokes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosopher-jokes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosopherzone.com/?p=2073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The First Law of Philosophy: For every philosopher, there exists an equal and opposite philosopher. The Second Law of Philosophy: They&#8217;re both wrong. Jean-Paul Sartre is sitting at a French cafe, revising his draft of Being and Nothingness. He says to the waitress, &#8220;I&#8217;d like a cup of coffee, please, with no cream.&#8221; The waitress <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosopher-jokes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/philosopher-jokes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Love You Like Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/i-love-you-like-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/i-love-you-like-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Possibly the largest collection of "I love you like" quotes on the internet.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/i-love-you-like-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the formal steps of right reasoning according to Descartes?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-are-the-formal-steps-of-right-reasoning-according-to-descartes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-are-the-formal-steps-of-right-reasoning-according-to-descartes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Descartes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Descartes Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formal steps of right reasoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Rene Descartes book, Discourse on Method, he devises four premises to the right steps of reasoning. 1. Accept nothing as true which is not presented to the mind so clearly and distinctly that there is no reason to doubt it. 2. Break problems down into as many smaller problems as possible. 3. Begin with <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-are-the-formal-steps-of-right-reasoning-according-to-descartes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-are-the-formal-steps-of-right-reasoning-according-to-descartes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do all good things come to an end?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-do-all-good-things-come-to-an-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-do-all-good-things-come-to-an-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good vs Evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why do all good things come to an end?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often have wondered why all good things come to an end. Whenever I seem to finally become complacent, suddenly life changes… My only real answer is that every new beginning comes from the death of another. So if the good things in life never ended, we would never truly appreciate them. And, even though <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-do-all-good-things-come-to-an-end/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-do-all-good-things-come-to-an-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it wrong to challenge the integrity of an accepted “truth”?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-it-wrong-to-challenge-the-integrity-of-an-accepted-%e2%80%9ctruth%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-it-wrong-to-challenge-the-integrity-of-an-accepted-%e2%80%9ctruth%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenging Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrong to Challenge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All premises, even if they are accepted as truthful, should still be challenged on a regular basis. Just because a truth may be valid for one instance does not mean that it always will be. Here is an excerpt from On Liberty by John Stuart Mills: 1. If an opinion contains truth and the opinion <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-it-wrong-to-challenge-the-integrity-of-an-accepted-%e2%80%9ctruth%e2%80%9d/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/is-it-wrong-to-challenge-the-integrity-of-an-accepted-%e2%80%9ctruth%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Basic Conventions of Moral Philosophy.</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 09:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventions Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moral philosophy is the study of ethics in relation to the ultimate questions of morality. There are two main branches of thought being Metaethics and Normative Ethics. Metaethics: Question: What is the nature and methodology of moral judgement? The study of Metaethics studies the nature and methodology of moral decision and judgment and asks questions <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why put off ’til tomorrow what you can do today?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Putting Off for Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Today not Tomorrow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally, a person should never delay longer than required, nor do today, what they could put off till tomorrow. Insight may be gained for tomorrows deeds today and if you could have prolonged what you chose to do today, you may have been able to do it better tomorrow. “Never do today what you can <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Logical Reasoning?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-is-logical-reasoning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-is-logical-reasoning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Reasoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To reason logically is to conclude something from something else. In an argument, to have logical reasoning, there must be a set of statements with logical premises and then a plausible conclusion. The common form of reasoning through philosophy is the attack of the variable P by arguing the absurdity or incalculability with Q. If <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-is-logical-reasoning/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/what-is-logical-reasoning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Is The Road To ‘Hades’ Paved With Good Intentions?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-is-the-road-to-%e2%80%98hades%e2%80%99-paved-with-good-intentions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-is-the-road-to-%e2%80%98hades%e2%80%99-paved-with-good-intentions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Intentions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hades Good Intentions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road to Hades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road to Hades and Good Intentions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What is Right?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The road to ‘Hades’ is often paved with good intentions due to the lack of actual good that is done on the journey. Often people say that they will spend time with their family, lose weight or quit smoking, but never get around to doing it until it is too late. It is one thing <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-is-the-road-to-%e2%80%98hades%e2%80%99-paved-with-good-intentions/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-is-the-road-to-%e2%80%98hades%e2%80%99-paved-with-good-intentions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are fools and fanatics always so certain of themselves, but wiser people are full of doubts?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certain of Themselves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fanatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I met a girl the other day at uni who asked me my view on this question. A personal conviction is easier to formulate if you have lesser knowledge about a given topic. Our world is outside absolutes. The actual possibilities are relative to constant variables and factors that influence all aspects of the impossibility. <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do all questions have an answer?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/do-all-questions-have-an-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/do-all-questions-have-an-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Answer to all Questions Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Answers Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do all questions have an answer?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All questions can be answered in some way or another. Whether they are correct or plausible is another matter. Nearly all questions are answerable with: “I do not know.” Which does not attain any real answer, but still is a tangible answer to any question. Therefore, there is an answer to all questions, but few <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/do-all-questions-have-an-answer/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/do-all-questions-have-an-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who, What, When, Where, Why, How? Explain?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/who-what-when-where-why-how-explain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/who-what-when-where-why-how-explain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Answer to all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explain?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[When]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Where]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who What When Where Why How? Explain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is my response to this vexing question: Who: The person I think I am. What: Whatever I want. Where: It’s not over there so it’s here. When: It’s not in the past or the future so it’s now. Why: Because you have asked. Explain: Something we never do well enough.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/who-what-when-where-why-how-explain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you eliminate the impossible, must whatever remains be the truth?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliminate the Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding Reality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not necessarily. If you were able to eliminate the impossible, you would be left with the possible. Just because something is possible does not mean it is the truth. Therefore, if you eliminate the impossible you are not left with the truth only a possible entity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom of Expression Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/freedom-of-expression-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/freedom-of-expression-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Quotes Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expression Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Expression Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Books won’t stay banned, They won’t burn. Ideas won’t go to jail. In the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. Alfred Whitney If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all Noam Chomsky If liberty means anything at all, <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/freedom-of-expression-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/freedom-of-expression-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Concept of a Truly Evil God.</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-concept-of-a-truly-evil-god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-concept-of-a-truly-evil-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 16:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concept of a Truly Evil God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil God Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good vs Evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is God Evil?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An epistemic question frequently raised is whether the world contains quantities of evil, in such a proportion, to grant the existence of the Judaeo-Christian God unrealistic. The prospect of explaining evil, considering the notion that God is omniscient and omnipotent, is plagued with ambiguity as to why a loving, benevolent and virtuous being would allow <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-concept-of-a-truly-evil-god/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-concept-of-a-truly-evil-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you were given a choice between contentment and reason, which would you choose?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-were-given-a-choice-between-contentment-and-reason-which-would-you-choose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-were-given-a-choice-between-contentment-and-reason-which-would-you-choose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contentment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contentment or Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the story of Lily the chicken: Once upon a time, there lived a chicken named Lily. She lived on a farm surrounded by hundreds of other chickens and was fed, watered and sheltered daily by a caring farmer. In her free time, Lily was able to socialise and enjoy all aspects of her <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-were-given-a-choice-between-contentment-and-reason-which-would-you-choose/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-were-given-a-choice-between-contentment-and-reason-which-would-you-choose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-meaning-of-%e2%80%98meaning%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-meaning-of-%e2%80%98meaning%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 02:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life's Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifes purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaning of Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people deliberate over the meaning of life’s existence, often they are seeking to attain knowledge of how the existence of one of us over time employs a purpose. Beyond drawing the distinction between the life of an individual and that of a group, there has been very little discussion of life as the bearer <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-meaning-of-%e2%80%98meaning%e2%80%99/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-meaning-of-%e2%80%98meaning%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

