For much of the 19th century, the United States was involved in a struggle over a human right more significant than the freedom of press – the freedom of every individual from slavery. While America remained preoccupied by its civil war, John Stuart Mill worked on his conception of freedom of expression, publishing On Liberty, in 1859. Focussing on civil rights, such as, freedom of association, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech, it motioned towards due process and the right to a fair trial, the entitlement to own property and respect of individual privacy. These social responsibilities and rights are often taken as subjective norms, as well as permeated normality.

The scope of Mills essay is subjected upon Social Liberty and the ability that governments can legitimately reserve power over society and the individual. Mill predicts that this question will become increasingly important because some humans have entered a more civilized stage of development, which presents “new conditions” under which issues of individual liberty must be addressed.

Concordantly, the concept of liberty is attributed to ancient Greece, Rome and England, whereby liberty implied “protection against the tyranny of political rulers,” and rulers and subjects were often thought to have a necessarily antagonistic relationship. The leader did not govern by the will of his people, and while his power was seen as necessary, it was also considered dangerous….

Read full Article.

 

Here is the story of Lily the chicken:

Once upon a time, there lived a chicken named Lily. She lived on a farm surrounded by hundreds of other chickens and was fed, watered and sheltered daily by a caring farmer. In her free time, Lily was able to socialise and enjoy all aspects of her life. She felt content and happy. Although she had little freedom, she was only a chicken and this life was all she had ever known.

It was Christmas Eve and Lily was eating her delicious dinner when she thought to herself about all the advantages of her life and how the farmer had always looked after her. The next day was Christmas. When Lily came for her breakfast, the farmer grabbed her and chopped her head off.

Lily was content with life because she was naive. She had contentment but lacked reason. If she had reasoned why the farmer was feeding her so graciously and nurturing her, she would have concluded that she was going to be killed.

Contentment leads to happiness, and reason often to depression. An earlier post describes my view on the attainment of happiness. If you read this you will further understand why reason is more imperative than contentment.