<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosopher&#039;s Zone &#187; Jurisprudence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosopherzone.com/tag/jurisprudence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com</link>
	<description>News and Views: Law, Philosophy and Psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>John Rawls Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-rawls-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-rawls-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American Political Philosopher (21/2/1921 &#8211; 24/11/2002) A Theory of Justice (1971) The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance. To each according to his threat advantage does not count as a principle of justice. One who lacks a sense of justice lacks certain fundamental attitudes and capacities included under the notion of <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-rawls-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/john-rawls-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Nozick Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nozick Juris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American libertarian philosopher (16/12/1938 – 23/1/2002). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) From each as they choose, to each as they are chosen. There is no social entity with a good that undergoes some sacrifice for its own good. There are only individual people, different individual people, with their own individual lives. Using one of these <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/robert-nozick-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brief Outline of Feminist Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 01:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judith Buttler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mckinnon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewcrichtons.com/?p=1324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the early 1980s law became subject to a variety of new and influential critiques. The foremost being the culmination of feminism. The vindications of women’s rights lead to a prominent movements, whereby, contextualisation of domestic violence, rape, sexual objectification, oppression, sexual discrimination, marriage and sexual marginalisation became scrutinized against the social normality, and new <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/feminist-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

