<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Philosopher&#039;s Zone &#187; Purpose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosopherzone.com/tag/purpose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com</link>
	<description>News and Views: Law, Philosophy and Psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Plato, Desire and its Unrelenting Love</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/plato-desire-and-its-unrelenting-love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/plato-desire-and-its-unrelenting-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love is often argued to be the most powerful and moving emotion. It drives us. Whether for sex, wealth, greed, power and/or for any other selfish need, we rely on this false ideology of love as being beautiful, untouched and selfless to claim our actions as permissible and out of the best interest of our <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/plato-desire-and-its-unrelenting-love/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/plato-desire-and-its-unrelenting-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Basic Conventions of Moral Philosophy.</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 09:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventions Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moral philosophy is the study of ethics in relation to the ultimate questions of morality. There are two main branches of thought being Metaethics and Normative Ethics. Metaethics: Question: What is the nature and methodology of moral judgement? The study of Metaethics studies the nature and methodology of moral decision and judgment and asks questions <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/the-basic-conventions-of-moral-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why put off ’til tomorrow what you can do today?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Putting Off for Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Today not Tomorrow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally, a person should never delay longer than required, nor do today, what they could put off till tomorrow. Insight may be gained for tomorrows deeds today and if you could have prolonged what you chose to do today, you may have been able to do it better tomorrow. “Never do today what you can <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-put-off-%e2%80%99til-tomorrow-what-you-can-do-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are fools and fanatics always so certain of themselves, but wiser people are full of doubts?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certain of Themselves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fanatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I met a girl the other day at uni who asked me my view on this question. A personal conviction is easier to formulate if you have lesser knowledge about a given topic. Our world is outside absolutes. The actual possibilities are relative to constant variables and factors that influence all aspects of the impossibility. <a href='http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/why-are-fools-and-fanatics-always-so-certain-of-themselves-but-wiser-people-are-full-of-doubts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you eliminate the impossible, must whatever remains be the truth?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crichton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliminate the Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding Reality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosopherzone.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not necessarily. If you were able to eliminate the impossible, you would be left with the possible. Just because something is possible does not mean it is the truth. Therefore, if you eliminate the impossible you are not left with the truth only a possible entity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosopherzone.com/if-you-eliminate-the-impossible-must-whatever-remains-be-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

